07/16/08 - A Second Chance

Posted by: Rob Brant

Tagged in: Untagged 

Yesterday. Finally. HR 6331 became law.

We are still waiting to hear from Medicare to understand how the damage will be undone. Some providers in the Round One Competitive Bidding Areas (CBAs), have already billed for July patients and received the contracted, lower reimbursement (See the Story Below).

The passage of H.R. 6331 means that my DME company can continue to work and be paid by Medicare for new orders received onward from July 1st. It also means that I will not have to figure out how I will survive the rest of the year on a minimum 26% cut in revenue.

In the background of the fight for 6331, AMEPA's Vice President Jack Marquez, Regulatory Chair - Sylvia Toscano and industry attorneys Javier Talamo and Jeff Baird devised a back-up plan for surviving the next 5 to 6 months under Competitive Bidding. No matter how the situation was analyzed each company had to lay off employees, reduce operation size, and the owners had to take massive salary cuts. The business models for 2009 spelled complete closure for most companies as the best case scenarios reduced business owners back to full time deliverymen, even with the ability to participate as a subcontractor.

 

We Deserve Life Under Competitive Bidding in Round One

Now that H.R. 6331 is law, I can reveal what I wanted to say last week but could not:

I deserve to close my business right now. If it was not for the incompetence of the Competitive Bidding Implementation Contractor (CBIC), we would be dead.

If the CBIC played by the rules released on April 10, 2007 and did their job properly we would not have any arguements. They should have announced:

  1. These companies are not licensed, so they are disqualified
  2. These companies have never provided these products before so they are not being considered
  3. These companies bid too high.
  4. These companies are in the pivital bid range and are your "Bid Winners"

A tremendous effort by AAHomecare in Washington

and the efforts and army of small providers behind VGM, the relentless work of Round One and Two providers, committed State Associations and some luck we averted disaster. The home medical equipment companies in the 400 counties and 70 MSAs of Round 2 would most likely be preparing to bid under the same broken system as well.

The creation of bills like HR 6252 and the foresight to merge them into HR 6331 does not happen as easily as the sunrise. It was carefully planned out by a full time staff in Washington and Waterloo. They came up with the plan. Their members, state associations, AMEPA members and some AMEPA spectators carried it out.

If this was July 2007, instead of July 2008, I doubt we would have succeeded. The upcoming Congressional, Senate and Presidential elections played a key role in this victory. The only way we will win this WAR for the entire industry is to unite and support AAHomecare, VGM and our active state associations immediately.

We need to make the most of this SECOND CHANCE!

We need to continue marching forward against Competitive Bidding. We need to continue educating our legislators and support them this Fall. We need to get our patients involved and explain to them that the service they receive is extra effort, not entitlement. We also need to change the perception of our industry in the national media. By achieving these goals we will stop competitive bidding and avert future government opposition designed to close the majority of accredited providers.

 

Providers Feel Medicare Cut
By Jack Marquez, Vice President

Yesterday, I received a payment from Medicare for a patient's Oxygen System, Date of Service: July 1, 2008. I was reimbursed $111.10 for the Oxygen Concentrator and $18.15 for the portable system. That $18.15 is supposed to cover as many tanks as the patient needs until July 31st. The patient has Florida Medicaid as Secondary Insurance and they will not cover the co-payment.

Now I have to rebill, send a letter and try to get the $60.00 that Medicare needs to pay me back. "That's a GOOD THING" a friend told me.

So providers relax, go back to business and enjoy what you have today. We will speak tomorrow at the teleconference.

THANKS TO ALL,

Jack

Trackback(0)
Comments (1)Add Comment
...
written by M.L. SORI, July 26, 2008
Question #1: Was H.R. 621 included in H.R.6331? My reason for asking is this: H.R. 621 [1]repeals the transfer of title of oxygen systems to Medicare beneficiaries, and [2] repeals the 36 month oxygen cap rental.

Question #2: What criteria did CMS use to justify the status change of oxygen. Oxygen was an item requiring frequent maintenance, now it is not. According to CMS oxygen no longer needs frequent maintenance. Because of the maintenance involved, the delivery instructions, the possible replacement of concentratosr at the supplier's cost, the possible replacement of other items such as oxygen conservers, regulators, tanks, etc, also at the supplier's cost, and of course the increasing costs of gasoline, oxygen is the one item that defines our industry as exactly what it is, a SERVICE INDUSTRY. So...what can we do, where do we go from here?
Question #3: Initially when we as suppliers began our battle against CMS the SBA was very instrumental in at least relaying our feelings to CMS. The SBA put CMS on notice so to speak. Granted the SBA has no legal power over CMS but they can influence opinion and publicize our desires and founded complaints as an industry. Would it be advisable to turn to the SBA once again for some kind of assistance?
Question #4: Can a Medicare accredited supplier under current CMS guidelines choose not to accept Medicare assignment on certain items?

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy