06/18/08 - Update From Washington D.C.

Posted by: Sean Schwighammer in News Anounces

Tagged in: Untagged 

Monday night and Tuesday morning AMEPA members from South Florida, Central Florida and Dallas Texas flew into Washington to meet with Representatives and Senators to urge them to approve HR #6252.

On Tuesday we visited with over 30 Congressmen and their staffs. As was previously reported the 'buzz' in Washington is regarding DME and competitive bidding. Staff members are up to date as to the newest proposed legislation and the attempts to achieve uniformity in the House and Senate versions. There were many successful meetings with Congressmen and Staff pledging support for DME.

Many providers from Round 2 areas such as Jacksonville and Arkansas sent us letters of introduction so we could speak on their behalf, although they could not make the trip to Washington. We had meetings with staffers form Congressman Vic Snyder from Little Rock and Senator Blanche Lincoln (D-AR) who seem to be on board with the proposed legislation to delay the program.

Walt Gorski and Stacy Harms of AA Homecare have been extremely helpful. They came to the House office building to review our meeting schedule, and advise and assist in meetings. AMEPA members utilized AAHomecare's summary of the proposed legislations to distribute to Congress.

John Gallagher and the staff from VGM have also provided a wealth of knowledge and guidance. In the words of one supportive Congressional Office: "The lives of the Beneficiaries are in your hands. Keep the Pressure On!"


Florida Dept of Health confirms 9 Oxygen Winners Unlicensed
On Tuesday it was confirmed by the Florida Department of Health, Drugs, Devices and Cosmetics Program that nine (9) of the Florida Oxygen Bid Winners ARE NOT licensed as Medical Oxygen Retailers in Florida. We provided a copy of that letter to all of the legislators that we have been meeting with. This supports AMEPA's contention that many of the winners are not capable to begin dispensing oxygen in 12 days on July 1st.

Hits: 1962
Trackback(0)
Comments (1)Add Comment
fraud & noncompliance...is there a difference
written by m l sori rrt, June 19, 2008
medicare has never differentiated between fraud and noncompliance: both entities are cleverly placed under the FRAUD umbrella. therefore an act of noncompliance [ie. having insufficient number of handicapped parking spaces at your location or having an improperly posted "hours of operation sign"] can be sufficient grounds for revocation of a medicare provider number, and since noncompliance violations comprise an extremely significant number of "violations" the numbers of fraud and abuse are beefed up exponentially. cms has used noncompliance data [which is in large part nonfraudulent] to fatten their claims of extreme fraud in the medicare system. this gives sandbagging a whole new meaning. congressmen, mr. mel martinez, beware, you are being sandbagged big time.

heres a thought: take the inspectors that are currently going location to location looking for minor noncompliance infractions and put them on a real task force to investigate and shut down REAL FRAUDULENT companies. shut them down, throw away the keys, and confiscate all of their business and personal assets, just like you would have done to drug dealers. how many billions of dollars might you save medicare if a measure of this common sensical magnitude was actually legistated. imagine, we may not even require the 9.5% reduction in dollars that has been proposed in order to offset the dollar reductions which competitive bidding would have achieved.

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy